IP
MONARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Gardner Fibre Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. Levi H. GREENWOOD, Otto W. Siebert, and Wiliiam E. Holman, Plaintiffs-Appellees
30 F.2d 548·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MONARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Gardner Fibre Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. Levi H. GREENWOOD, Otto W. Siebert, and Wiliiam E. Holman, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
January 11, 1929.
No. 3908.
Drury W. Cooper and Thomas J. Byrne, both of New York City, for appellants.
Charles Neave, of New York City, Harrison P. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., Arthur William Nelson, of Chicago, Ill., and Henry R. Ashton, of New York City, for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
TMs ease involves no legal questions or principles; the decisive issue being whether tbe patent involved invention. Tbe patent was thoroughly discussed by Judge Bodine, and bis reasons for bolding it valid and infringed are summarized in his opinion. Finding ourselves in accord with the conclusion he reached, a further discussion by this court would simply be an effort to put in different language what be has already so well said. We therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree on Ms opinion.