Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA
128 U.S. 3932 L. Ed. 345·Supreme Court of the United States·1888
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 56.
Submitted October 18, 1888.
Decided October 22, 1888.
On the authority of Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460, and Ratterman v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 127 U. S. 411, this case is reversed and remanded for such further proceedings as justice may require.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. M. E. Olmsted for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. S. Kirkpatrick, Attorney General of Pennsylvania,' for defendant in error. Mr. John F. Samderson, .Deputy. Attorney General, was also on the brief.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Fuller]
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller
delivered the opinion of the court.
Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for taxes on telegraphic messages sent from point to point within the State of Pennsylvania; on messages sent from points within the State to points in other States; on messages sent from points in other States to points within the State; and on messages sent'to and from points in other States, which passed, over lines partly within- the State; and the record discloses the several amounts of taxes upon the several classes of messages, which, with. commissions and interest, make up the total recovery. It is clear, and this is conceded by the defendant in error, that, under the decisions of this court in Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460, and Ratterman v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 127 U. S. 411, the Commonwealth was not entitled to recover for the taxes in question, excepting in respect to the messages transmitted wholly within the State.
The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as justice may require.