General

KAREN M. BUDAHAZY v. JAY R. BUDAHAZY

127 Conn. App. 362·Connecticut Appellate Court·2011·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

KAREN M. BUDAHAZY v. JAY R. BUDAHAZY (AC 31725) Bishop, Lavine and Bear, Js. Argued January 13 officially released March 15, 2011 Jay R. Budahazy, pro se, the appellant (defendant). Stephanie M. Weaver, for the appellee (plaintiff). [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] Opinion PER CURIAM. The defendant, Jay R. Budahazy, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Karen M. Budahazy, and issuing certain financial orders, including awarding attorney’s fees to the plaintiff. After a careful review of the trial court record and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties in this matter, we conclude that the defendant has not sustained his burden with respect to any of the eight “[p]rincipal [i]ssues” he raises in his appeal. The judgment is affirmed.