General
BLACKWELL v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.
204 F. 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BLACKWELL v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit.
May 14, 1913.)
No. 2,103.
In Error to District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California.
See, also, 184 Fed. 489.
Thomas, Beedy & Lanagan, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.
William F. Herrin, C. W. Durbrow, and G. V. Shoup, all of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for plaintiff in error to dismiss the writ of error, and pursuant to stipulation-therefor of counsel for respective parties, said motion is granted, and writ of error dismissed, with costs in favor of the defendant in error and against plaintiff in error.