General
Esther Greenberg, Respondent, v. Rosoff Realties, Inc., Appellant
10 A.D.2d 832·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1960·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(April 19, 1960)
Esther Greenberg, Respondent, v. Rosoff Realties, Inc., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order granting a motion of plain tiff-respondent to vacate the dismissal of the complaint unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to condition the granting of the motion upon payment by plain tiff-respondent of a full bill of costs to date, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. The reasons for the delays in prosecution are such that the further imposition of costs is warranted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion.