Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Kent v. Sanford, Warden; and Miller v. United States
315 U.S. 799·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 610.
No. 808.
Kent v. Sanford, Warden; and Miller v. United States.
February 2, 1942.
Mr. Augustus M. Roan for petitioner in No. 610. William Roy Miller, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and W. Marvin Smith for respondent in No. 610; and Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for the United States in No. 808.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and motions for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Pat Duggan, pro se.