Bankruptcy
In re: John S. BREEN; Teresa J. Breen, Debtors. John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Baltmore Gas and Electric Company, Defendant-Appellee, and Zvi Guttman, Trustee
182 F. App'x 237·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re: John S. BREEN; Teresa J. Breen, Debtors. John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Baltmore Gas and Electric Company, Defendant-Appellee, and Zvi Guttman, Trustee.
No. 05-2010.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2006.
Decided: May 25, 2006.
John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen, Appellants Pro Se. John Douglas Burns, The Burns Law Firm, L.L.C., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their complaint filed against Baltimore Gas & Electric alleging violations of the automatic stay in their bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breen v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., Nos. CA-05-156-RDB; BK-02-58017; AP-02-5817 (D.Md. Aug. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED