Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Appellant, to Acquire Certain Real Estate in the Town of Hempstead for Purposes of Water Supply. William De C. White et al., Respondents
192 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Appellant, to Acquire Certain Real Estate in the Town of Hempstead for Purposes of Water Supply. William De C. White et al., Respondents.
Matter of City of New York, 125 App. Div. 219, affirmed.
(Argued May 19, 1908;
decided June 2, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 23, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term awarding claimants in a condemnation pi’oceeding separate bills of costs and fixing allowances of counsel.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell and Edward H. Wilson, of counsel) for appellant.
John Lyon, Francis G. Holey, Albert E. Seibert, Harry G. Clock, James P. Niemann, Theodore N. Ripsom, Seth Sprague Terry and Walter Underhill for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.