General
Clark BEHLER, Plaintiff in error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
9 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clark BEHLER, Plaintiff in error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
December 4, 1925.
Rehearing Denied January 15, 1926.)
No. 3591.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Indiana.
Floyd J. Mattice, of Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff in error.
Albert Ward, of Peru, Ind., for the United States.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The questions presented on this writ of error are .practically identical with those raised in the case of Chapman v. United States, 9 F.(2d) 790, decided by this court December 2, 1925, and no separate opinion is necessary.
On the strength of the opinion in Chapman v. United States, the judgment here is affirmed. .