Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of Lemon Thomson et al., Appellants, to Float Logs on Moose River, etc., v. Julia L. DeCamp et al., Respondents
147 N.Y. 701·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Lemon Thomson et al., Appellants, to Float Logs on Moose River, etc., v. Julia L. DeCamp et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 86 Hun, 405.
(Argued October 7, 1895;
decided October 22, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in.the fourth judicial department, made April 23,1895, which reversed an order of the Special Term denying defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition in condemnation, proceedings and dismissed the petition.
Charles K. Snyder for appellants.
C. D. Adams for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.