General
AMERICAN BONDING CO. OF BALTIMORE et al. v. SIMPLEX ELECTRICAL CO. et al.
222 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN BONDING CO. OF BALTIMORE et al. v. SIMPLEX ELECTRICAL CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 15, 1915.)
No. 2566.
Error to the District Court of (he United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California.
Lilienthal, McKinstry & Raymond, Denson, Cooley & Denson, A. C. Skaife, W. H. Chapman, and A. «Í. Treat, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.
Willard P. Smith, and B. B. Blake, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error Simplex Electric Co. Walter D. Mansfield and Milton Newmarlc, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error Crane Co. Henry G. W. DinkeL spiel and J. M. Thomas, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error H. W. Johns-Manville Co.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to stipulation .filed April 15, 1915, cause entered dismissed by the clerk-under tbe provisions of rule 20, without ■costs to any of the parties.