Contracts · MBE-tested
WALKER v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
387 U.S. 236·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALKER v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 354,
Misc.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Petitioner pro se.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Stanley D. Kupiszewski, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.