General
Danford J. Penfold and Another, Respondents, v. Hubert Larkin, Individually and as Surviving Member, etc., Appellant
167 A.D. 952·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Danford J. Penfold and Another, Respondents, v. Hubert Larkin, Individually and as Surviving Member, etc., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order denying motion for new trial affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order granting additional allowance of costs dismissed, because the record does not include the order or the papers upon which it was made. All concurred.