General
Samuel S. Perry v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 335·United States Customs Court·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
April 14, 1955
No. 58943.
protests 71645-K, etc. (Seattle).
Samuel S. Perry v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Mollison, J.]
Opinion by
Mollison, J.
It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under the said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). Protest 86081-K, having been abandoned, was dismissed.