Corporations

Abraham Goldfarb, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent; Empire Commercial Corporation, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent; Abraham Goldfarb, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent

238 A.D. 830·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Abraham Goldfarb, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent. Empire Commercial Corporation, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent. Abraham Goldfarb, Appellant, v. Fishel Mintz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Samuel Taxin, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present ■ — • Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.