Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Torts · MBE-tested
The People ex rel. Alexander McBride, Respondents, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant
51 N.Y. 623·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Alexander McBride, Respondents, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 4,1872;
decided May term, 1872.)
Proceedings under the statute of forcible entry and detainer.
The relator was in possession of certain premises adjoining defendant’s road. Certain of the employes of defendant, under the direction of its general superintendent, entered upon the premises and forcibly expelled relator, threatening him with injury if he returned. Defendant immediately took and retained possession of the premises. Held, that the presumption was that the act was not a voluntary, willful trespass upon the part of the superintendent and his men, but an official act for the benefit of defendant; at least the act was fully ratified, and defendant was therefore liable.
A. P. Laning for the appellant.
John C. Strong for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Hunt, C.,]
Hunt, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute against defendant, with costs.