Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
SKOLNICK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY et al.
389 U.S. 26·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SKOLNICK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY et al.
No. 91,
Misc.
Decided October 16, 1967.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97.