General
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Respondent, v. City of Buffalo, New York, and James W. Higgins, as Commissioner of Police of the City of Buffalo, New York, Appellants
250 A.D. 821·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Respondent, v. City of Buffalo, New York, and James W. Higgins, as Commissioner of Police of the City of Buffalo, New York, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Cowan v. City of Buffalo (247 App. Div. 591) and People v. Kuc (272 N. Y. 72). All concur. (The order directs entry of the judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings restraining defendants from interfering with shoe' business owned by plaintiff and adjudges an ordinance unconstitutional.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Cunningham, JJ.
See Buffalo City Ordinances, chap. 25, § 159-f, adopted Sept. 3,1935. — [Rep.