General
ST. LOUIS S. W. RY. CO. OF TEXAS v. MACIEL (two cases)
227 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1915
Gordon Russell, Judge. · Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and SPEER, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ST. LOUIS S. W. RY. CO. OF TEXAS v. MACIEL (two cases).
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 27, 1915.)
No. 2788.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas;
Gordon Russell, Judge.
S. P. Ross and Sam R. Scott, both of Waco, Tex., for plaintiff's in error. S. Engolking, of San Antonio, Tex., for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and SPEER, District Judge.
Rehearing denied January 4, 1916.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These cases were tried together in the District Court, aro brought to this court on separate writs, and were heard here together. The errors assigned relate to the charge of the court as given and to the refusal of special charges requested, and we find none of the assignments well taken. The charge of the court was clear, and fairly and Cully covered the issues in both cases, and was as favorable to the plaintiff in error as the proof warranted. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed in both cases.