General
M. Pressner & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 66/7811 and 66/7830 (New York); Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 66/13482, etc. (New York); Dan Brechner & Co. et al. v. United States, protests 66/57152, etc. (New York)
59 Cust. Ct. 877·United States Customs Court·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
August 23, 1967
No. P67/274.
No. P67/275.
No. P67/276.
M. Pressner & Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 66/7811 and 66/7830 (New York). Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 66/13482, etc. (New York). Dan Brechner & Co. et al. v. United States, protests 66/57152, etc. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Bichardson, J.]
Bichardson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called “miniature hunting knives” similar in all material respects to those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.