General
E. R. PORTUCHECK, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
293 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1923
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E. R. PORTUCHECK, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 27, 1923.)
No. 4070.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; James C. Wilson, Judge.
Will 0. Austin, of Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff in error. Henry Zweifel, U. S. Atty., of Fort Worth, Tex., (Henry Zweifel, of Fort Worth, Tex., Mack Taylor, of Stephenville, Tex., and F. M. Parrish, of Fort Worth. Tex., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.