Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
South Carolina Generating Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Georgia Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and South Carolina Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission et al.
356 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 697.
No. 762.
No. 782.
South Carolina Generating Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; Georgia Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and South Carolina Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission et al.
W. C. McLain, D. W. Robinson, Arthur M. Williams, Jr., T. Justin' Moore, George D. Gibson and John W. Riely for petitioner in No. 697. William C. Chanler for petitioner in No. 762. T. C. Callison, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Irvine F. Belser, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner in No. 782. Solicitor General Rankin, Paul A. Sweeney, Willard W. Gatchell, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Theodore French for the Federal Power Commission, respondent. With them on the briefs was Assistant Attorney General Doub for the Federal Power Commission, respondent in Nos. 762 and 782.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 249 F. 2d 755.