General
In the Matter of City of New York, Petitioner, v. Thomas C. Jorling, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Respondents, and Quail Ridge Associates, Intervenor-Respondent
171 A.D.2d 864·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1991·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of City of New York, Petitioner, v Thomas C. Jorling, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Respondents, and Quail Ridge Associates, Intervenor-Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated May 26, 1988, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the intervenor-respondent’s application for a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Weinstein Enters, v Jorling, 171 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]). Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.