Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Morgan v. Callender
8 U.S. 3704 Cranch 370·Supreme Court of the United States·1808
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
*Morgan v. Callender.
Appellate jurisdietion.
An appeal lies from the district court of the United States, for the territory of Orleans, tc this court.
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe United States for tbe territory of Orleans, in a suit in equity.
That court was established by tbe act of congress, of 26th March 1804, § 8 (1 U. S. Stat. 285), and has a jurisdietion similar to that given to tbe district court of tbe United States for tbe district of Kentucky.
[MAJORITY]
This Court was of opinion, that an appeal lies from that court to this ; but that in this case, tbe court below bad not jurisdiction, because it did not appear that tbe parties were citizens of different states, nor aliens, &c., so as to give them a right to litigate in tbe courts of tbe United States.