General
William Biel and Leonard Biel, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Biel & Biel, Respondents, v. Frank A. Harkin, Appellant, and Carmen E. Harkin, Defendant
206 A.D. 621·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1923·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Second Department,
March, 1923.
William Biel and Leonard Biel, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Biel & Biel, Respondents, v. Frank A. Harkin, Appellant, and Carmen E. Harkin, Defendant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[MAJORITY]
This motion having been renewed after the complaint herein was amended, and the order denying that motion having been affirmed (Biel v. Harkin, No. 2, post, p. 621), this appeal is dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.