General
Frank McWHORTER v. J. Russell McELROY, Judge, etc.
23 Ala. App. 654123 So. 926·Alabama Court of Appeals·1929·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(123 So. 926)
Frank McWHORTER v. J. Russell McELROY, Judge, etc.
(6 Div. 494.)
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
June 25, 1929.
Cora R. Thompson and T. J. Lamar, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.
Horace C. Wilkinson, of Birmingham, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
All of the questions presented have been decided adversely to petitioner’s contention in the cases of Ex parte Von L. Thompson et al., ante, p. 46, 121, So. 429; Ex parte Morris, etc., ante, p. 95, 122 So. 606; Morris v. McElroy, 219 Ala. 369, 122 So. 608. On authority of these cases, the petition in this case is dismissed, and the writ of mandamus is denied.
Petition dismissed. Writ denied.