General
Adam S. Matheson et al., as Receivers of The American Tube and Iron Company, Appellants, v. Clifton Wharton, Jr., as Assignee of Jacob Jamer, etc., and The National Tube Works Company, Respondents
153 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adam S. Matheson et al., as Receivers of The American Tube and Iron Company, Appellants, v. Clifton Wharton, Jr., as Assignee of Jacob Jamer, etc., and The National Tube Works Company, Respondents.
Matheson v. Wharton, 89 Hun, 409, affirmed.
(Argued May 10, 1897;
decided June 8, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 18, 1895, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee and granted a new trial.
Edgar J. Nathan and Michael H. Oardozo for appellants.
Alfred Jcvretzhi and James McKeen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the appellants, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., not voting.