Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Local 12, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. O., v. National Labor Relations Board
344 U.S. 823·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 124.
No. 140.
Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Local 12, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. O., v. National Labor Relations Board.
Louis S. Lebo for petitioner in No. 124.
Lowell Goerlich for petitioner in No. 140.
Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling and Mozart G. Ratner for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 196 F. 2d 500.