Contracts · MBE-tested
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES
393 U.S. 534·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. · Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 878.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.