General
Hugh J. Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Isadore Saul, Individually and Doing Business as Saul Equipment Co., Appellant, et al., Defendants
268 A.D. 1017·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hugh J. Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Isadore Saul, Individually and Doing Business as Saul Equipment Co., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
There was sufficient evidence to establish defendant-appellant’s liability to plaintiff for the judgment originally rendered, and to sustain a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint as to defendant Alexander C. Dolan. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.