Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Jacob Glos et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William L. O'Connell, County Treasurer, etc., et al.
231 U.S. 740·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 332.
Jacob Glos et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William L. O’Connell, County Treasurer, etc., et al.
In error to the Supréme Court of the State of Illinois.
Motion to dismiss submitted November 17, 1913.
Decided December 1, 1913.
Submitted by the plaintiffs in error, pro se.
Mr, George Gillette for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Jacob Glos v. The City of Chicago &c., 226 U. S. 599, and authorities there cited.