Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Henry S. Waugh, Respondent, v. Charles O. Bailly et al., Noah B. Shute, Purchaser, Appellant
115 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry S. Waugh, Respondent, v. Charles O. Bailly et al., Noah B. Shute, Purchaser, Appellant.
(Argued June 19, 1889;
decided June 28, 1889.)
Appeal from order of General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 29, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term requiring defendant to complete purchase under decree of foreclosure.
Charles H. Lovett for appellant.
Joseph F. Mosher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.