Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Rogers, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, et al. v. Société Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al.
364 U.S. 895·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 397.
Rogers, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, et al. v. Société Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Com-merciales, S. A., et al.
Solicitor General Rankin, Dallas S. Townsend, Ralph S. Spritzer and Irving Jaffe for petitioners. John J. Wilson for Société Internationale, Irving Moskovitz, Robert E. Sher, Isadore G. Aik and James H. Heller for Eric G. Kaufman et al., and Edmund L. Jones and C. Frank Reijsnyder for Ernest Attenhofer et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.