General
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.; and Williams et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
331 U.S. 791·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1344.
No. 1345.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.; and Williams et al. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
June 2, 1947.
J. A. Rauhut, Nelson Jones, Norman L. Meyers, Rex G. Baker and R. E. Seagler for appellant in No. 1344. Dan Moody for Williams et ah, appellants in No. 1345. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and Fagan Dickson, First Assistant Attorney General, for the Railroad Commission of Texas et al., and James P. Hart for Ashcroft et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgments are affirmed.
Reported below: 193 S. W. 2d 824.