Contracts · MBE-tested
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DARWIN), Respondent
81 A.3d 882·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2013·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., Petitioners v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DARWIN), Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 9, 2013.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Robinson), — Pa. -, 67 A.3d 1194 (2013).