General
Heimlich Bros. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1068·United States Customs Court·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
February 17, 1969
No. P69/48.
protest 67/45335 (New York).
Heimlich Bros. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Landis, J.]
Landis, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Singer sewing-machines which are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. (Bertrand Freres, Inc., et. al v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296.)