Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
John PANICO and Gaetano Sorrentino, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
2 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John PANICO and Gaetano Sorrentino, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 15, 1924.)
No. 56.
In Error to tho District" Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Alexander S. Drescher, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Harold J. Drescher, of Brooklyn, N. Y. on the brief), for plaintiff in error Pánico.
Isidore Oshlag, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in error Sorrentino.
Ralph C. Greene, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. X. (William A. De Groot, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed in open court.