Tax
MEMPHIS LINOTYPE PRINTING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
34 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MEMPHIS LINOTYPE PRINTING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 5, 1929.
No. 5447.
Charles M. Bryan, of Memphis, Tenn., and O. R. Ewing, of New York City, for petitioner.
C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Docketed and dismissed for failure to comply with provisions of rule 18.