General
Kate Schmidt and Charles Schmidt, Respondents, v. William Entenmann, Jr., Doing Business as Entenmann Bakery, Appellant
261 A.D. 1101·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kate Schmidt and Charles Schmidt, Respondents, v. William Entenmann, Jr., Doing Business as Entenmann Bakery, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff Kate Schmidt, and companion action of her husband, Charles Schmidt, for expenses and loss of services. Judgment for the plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P- J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.