Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Charles F. BICKEL and Charles J. Farley, Doing Business as The Ætna Shipping Company, Appellee, v. COMPAGNIE GENERAL TRANSATLANTIQUE and The S. S. FRANCE, Appellant
42 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles F. BICKEL and Charles J. Farley, Doing Business as The Ætna Shipping Company, Appellee, v. COMPAGNIE GENERAL TRANSATLANTIQUE and The S. S. FRANCE, Appellant.
No. 389.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 30, 1930.
Joseph P. Nolan and Frank T. Hendl, both of New York City, for appellant.
Purrington & McConnell, of New York City (Frank J. McConnell and James D. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree increased from $1,928.43 to $2,-428.43, and, as so modified, affirmed.