Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of America (A. F. L.), et al. v. Austin et al.
348 U.S. 979·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 577.
Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of America (A. F. L.), et al. v. Austin et al.
Edward N. Barnard for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from
the Supreme Court of Michigan.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.