General
Timothy L. McMichaels et al., Respondents, v. Arthur S. Bechhoefer, Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Richard C. Ackerman et al., Respondents, v. Arthur S. Bechhoefer, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
214 A.D.2d 950626 N.Y.S.2d 711·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1995·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Timothy L. McMichaels et al., Respondents, v Arthur S. Bechhoefer, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Richard C. Ackerman et al., Respondents, v Arthur S. Bechhoefer, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
[626 NYS2d 711]
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Bender, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Yates County, Bender, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.