General

In the Matter of the Petition of Charles A. Wund, Appellant, for an Alternative Prohibition Order Directed against Hon. Samuel Seabury, as Referee, to Conduct an Investigation of the Magistrates' Courts of the First Judicial Department and the Magistrates Thereof, Respondent

233 A.D. 655·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Petition of Charles A. Wund, Appellant, for an Alternative Prohibition Order Directed against Hon. Samuel Seabury, as Referee, to Conduct an Investigation of the Magistrates’ Courts of the First Judicial Department and the Magistrates Thereof, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.