Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
UNITED STATES v. SOLOMON
70 F.2d 834·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. SOLOMON.
No. 204.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 21, 1934.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
• Motion for leave to proceed on this appeal in forma pauperis.
The defendant pleaded guilty and now appeals from a sentence of two years on count 1 and three years on the other counts of the indictment, the latter to run consecutively with the sentence on count 1. His sole point urged on the appeal is that 18 USCA § 709a, effective June 29, 1932, precludes consecutive sentences. We do not construe this section of the United States Code Annotated as forbidding consecutive sentences.
Application denied.