Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
UNITED STATES of America v. John T. KELLER
69 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America v. John T. KELLER.
No. 5125.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
April 26, 1934.
Val Nolan, U. S. Atty., of Indianapolis, Ind., for the United States.
Noble J. Johnson, of Terre Haute, Ind., and Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before ALSCHÜLER, EVANS, and EITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of the appellant, pursuant to stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the appeal heretofore taken on or about October 7, 1933, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.