Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles J. Vullo, Appellant, v. Linda Vullo, Respondent
231 A.D.2d 864648 N.Y.S.2d 410·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles J. Vullo, Appellant, v Linda Vullo, Respondent.
[648 NYS2d 410]
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed plaintiff to reimburse defendant for the amount of separate property she expended to satisfy marital obligations during the pendency of the divorce action (see, Shahidi v Shahidi, 129 AD2d 627, 630; 48A NY Jur 2d, Domestic Relations, § 2513, at 272). The record supports the court’s calculation of arrears due under the pendente lite orders. (Appeal from Judgment and Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Equitable Distribution.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.