Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Charles Schweinler Press, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York
242 U.S. 618·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 120.
Charles Schweinler Press, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York.
In error to the Court of Special Sessions, First District, New York City, State of New York.
Argument commenced November 16, 1915.
Decided December 18, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185; Louisiana Navigation Company v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99; Thompson v. St. Louis, 241 U. S. 637. Mr. Alfred E. Ommen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Bobert S. Johnstone and Mr. Leonard J. Oberman for the defendant in error.