Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States
244 U.S. 645·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 266.
Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States.
In .error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 1917.
Decided May 21, 1917.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hollander v. Fechheimer, 162 U. S. 326; California National Bank v. Stateler, 171 U. S. 447; Martinez v. International Banking Corporation, 220 U. S. 214, 222-223.
Mr. James H. Campbell and Mr. Elvert M: Davis for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Underwood and Mr. S. Milton Simpson for the United States.