General
The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. David Valentine et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents
97 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Central National Bank of the City of New York, Appellant, v. David Valentine et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents.
(Argued October 22, 1884;
decided November 25, 1884.)
The principal questions in this case the court held, were simply of fact, and that the findings of the trial court thereon were sustained by sufficient evidence.
Aaron Pennington Whitehead for appellant.
William S. Hornblower for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.