Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lydia Cole, Appellant, v. Kate C. Brown et al., Respondents
156 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lydia Cole, Appellant, v. Kate C. Brown et al., Respondents.
Gole v. Brown, 88 Hun, 616, affirmed.
(Argued May 2, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 29, 1895, affirming a judgment of the Monroe County Court in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury.
Quincy Van Voorhis for appellant.
Walter S. Hubbell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.